Permanent disfigurement, chronic pain, and lives forever altered—these are not distant headlines, but realities playing out when institutional healthcare fails the people it is meant to protect. The alarm bells ring louder each year, yet the system trudges on, repeating the same mistakes, while real solutions sit neglected at the margins.
The pandemic stripped away any illusions. When the Canadian Armed Forces arrived in Ontario’s long-term care homes, it wasn’t a story of individual error, but of systemic collapse. Institutions with robust staffing emerged less scarred; those left to ration hands-on care saw the virus spread, negligence thrive, and families shattered. The official response? Set a target: four hours of direct care per resident per day. Yet, data from 2024 revealed gaping disparities, with some homes offering less than two hours—a grim arithmetic that translates to more wounds, more falls, and more isolation.
Patient safety cannot be designed around damage control. It must be built on prevention. At its heart, this means starting at home. Investment in home care is not a luxury or a side project; it is preventive medicine incarnate. The evidence is clear: where home care is strong, emergencies lessen, hospitalizations drop, and people age in dignity, not despair. Doris Grinspun of the Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario puts it plainly: inadequate staffing “means you’re not getting the care you need.”
Ontario’s persistent faith in institutional beds, often propped up by for-profit logic, ignores a simple truth: community and municipal models, supported by local investment, consistently deliver safer, more personal care. Homes subsidized with municipal taxes regularly exceed provincial staffing targets, while the for-profit sector lags behind. The advocacy against expanding licences for chronic underperformers is not mere politics; it’s a demand for a healthcare system that values people over profit.
Critics may argue that home care faces its own workforce shortages, and scaling up is complex. But the alternative—pouring public funds into an institutional model proven vulnerable to crisis and neglect—is a false economy. Every dollar invested in empowering families and supporting care in the community is a shield against the next tragedy. The risk of inaction is not hypothetical; it is well-documented and deeply personal for too many Ontarians.
Let’s set new priorities. Make the metrics public, hold providers accountable, and shift resources from reactive to proactive care. Establish clear pathways for home care funding, ensure parity in worker remuneration, and dismantle the barriers that keep innovative solutions from taking root. The next crisis can be averted, but only if we have the will to build a system that acts before disaster strikes, not after.
If you’re interested and haven’t already, subscribe to our newsletter.